genderandsexualityexperience:

• @preternaural-aura asked: I wanna see what age groups are exclusionist and in what ways are they queer/lgbt and if within exclusionists if different age groups are queer/lgbt in different ways (so if older exclusionists are terfs) and i cant remember if it was in the survey but it would be cool to know how involved in local communities exclusionists are (all of this versus inclusionists)

Sorry about the weird publishing style. Trying to answer the ask directly kept posting an empty block or just utterly crashing my page. I think tumblr doesn’t care for the amount of maths I’m doing.

So, first off, here is a link to a table of the complete age data for the questions “Do you identify as an exclusionist” and “do you identify as an inclusionist.”

The image above is a pie chart of the following data.

For those explicitly identifying as exclusionists

• 3.1% are under 15 years old
• 24.6% are 15-16 years old
• 30.8% are 17-18 years old
• 20% are 19-20 years old
• 15.4% are 21-25 years old
• 4.6% are 26-30 years old
• 1.5% are 46-50 years old (Note: only one respondent identifies as exclusionist and is 46-50 years of age).

58.5% of those identifying as exclusionists are 18 years or younger. 6.1% are over 25 years of age. The single largest age group is 17-18 years old.

The image above is a pie chart of the following information:

Among those explicitly identifying as inclusionists, the following ages were listed:

• 4.7% are under 15 years of age
• 15.7% are 15-16 years of age
• 19.2 are 17-18 years of age
• 19.3 are 19-20 years of age
• 26.8 are 21-25 years of age
• 10.2 are 26-30 years of age
• 2.7% are 31-35 years of age
• 0.6% are 36-40 years of age
• 0.2% are 41-45

  years of age

• 0.2% are 46-50

  years of age

• 0.1% 51-55

  years of age

• 0.2% 56-60

  years of age

39.6% of inclusionist respondents are 18 years old or younger. 14.2% are older than 25 years. The single largest age group was 21-25 years old.

Overall, inclusionist identifying respondents had a wider range of ages with a more even spread over several age groups, and tended to be older than those identifying as exclusionists. 

The above image is a bar chart (vertical) displaying the absolute values (rather than percentages) of inclusionist and exclusionist identifying respondents based on age.

• Under 15
• Inclusionists: 66
• Exclusionists: 2
• 15-16
• Inclusionists: 223
• Exclusionists: 16
• 17-18
• Inclusionists: 272
• Exclusionists: 20
• 19-20
• Inclusionists: 274
• Exclusionists: 13
• 21-25
• Inclusionists: 380
• Exclusionists: 10
• 26-30
• Inclusionists: 145
• Exclusionists: 3
• 31-35
• Inclusionists: 38 
• No exclusionists in this age range
• 36-40
• Inclusionists: 9 
• No exclusionists in this age range
• 41-45
• Inclusionists: 3 
• No exclusionists in this age range
• 46-50
• Inclusionists: 3
• Exclusionists: 1
• 51-55
• Inclusionists: 1 
• No exclusionists in this age range
• 56-60
• Inclusionists: 3
• No exclusionists in this age range

I will make up a complete demographics table for inclusionist-identifying and exclusionist-identifying a little later on, since there is apparently a very high demand for one. For the time being, let’s look at those who identify as radical feminists, and those who hold opinions on gender identity that overlap with the prevailing opinions of radical feminists.

• Those identifying as radical feminists also identified as exclusionists 129.3% more often than the general response pool, at 9.4% vs 4.1%.
• Those identifying as sex work critical also identified as exclusionists 231.7% more often than the general response pool, at 13.6%.
• Those identifying as kink critical also identified as exclusionists 153.5% more often than the general response pool, at 10.4%.
• Those who believe trans women are not biologically female identify as exclusionists 63.4% more often than the general response pool, at 6.7%.
• Those who believe nonbinary people are not biologically nonbinary identify as exclusionists 82.9% more often than the general response pool, at 7.5%.

In contrast, those groups identified as inclusionist:

• Radical feminism: 13.9% less often
• Sex work critical: 18.8% less often
• Kink critical: 12.1% less often
• Bioessentialism re trans women: 7.7% less often
• Bioessentialism re nonbinary people: 7.5% less often

Overall, there is a very distinct tendency for those who either identify as radical feminists or hold popular radical feminist beliefs, to identify as exclusionist more frequently, and identify as inclusionist less frequently, than is the case in the general response pool.

And finally, this survey did not collect information on the definition of abuse, or for local community engagement, which have both been highly requested, and will likely appear in subsequent surveys.